The photo shows Trump's left hand up like swear on Bible and right arm bent at the elbow with hand left to flop at his rib, his mouth is open and with no audio at all you can still hear Trump's voice, "You should see the guy." Yes, he his clearly imitating whatever it was he saw.
Trump's critics display a photo of the NYT journalist that Trump is imitating. The two postures match perfectly.
Am I bad for cracking up laughing?
The item on Hot Air has 889 comments to it presently and that had me laughing all over again. I haven't actually read any of it. Just those two photos. The guy puts me in stitches.
33 comments:
Chip you are not supposed to laugh. You are supposed to wet your panties and cry about how cruel it is,
They all want trump to be like Romney. Look how that worked out .
If he made fun of my mobility that wouldn't be funny at all. Not one bit.
Not really. Because I'd be laughing back. You just wait, Buddy, I'll have my laugh at you. At you.
I know this for certain because it just happened again at that couple with the fabulous Cheesman apartment and the crèche in the Gore office / bedroom to White House and to JFK, that hosted Johns sort of small reception,
Gag me with a Paul Revere silver spoon from the Mayflower.
At the end of it, early to accommodate old people, Milo getting out of a chair, everything out-scaled so a throne, Milo inched forward to the front edge, scootch, scootch, scootch, and using the seat to push off not the sturdy arms as expected, he did a very nice and graceful job of standing up and I rolled back laughing into the cushions of my own oversized seat. For it being a job. Milo enjoyed being enjoyed too. Who knew it could be so funny just getting up out of a chair? That by itself is hilarious. So, Trump has it coming, and I'll be laughing my ass off.
Puts me in mind of Limbaugh mocking Michael J. Fox. Trump is really playing this vulgarity up. Is he really a lot like this, or is it nudge, nudge, wink, wink to the voters. Are we in on the joke while the libs and MSM are having kittens?
Considering how the Left sees anybody around somebody who dares disagree with them as fair game, I can't get wound up about this.
I've been waiting 50 years for somebody in the public eye to give it back to them and, except for Ann Coulter, The Donald's the only one.
Hence, his appeal.
The Reality TV mentality is, the more stupid and shocking the better.
So let me get this straight: if Trump loses, then that will mean his approach was wrong from day one, right, just like Romney? If he fails to even get the nomination, then that means Romney was even smarter and a better candidate than Trump all along?
I think Trump is the only top tier Republican who can lose to Hillary. He has already alienated 55% of the vote.
bagoh20 said...
So let me get this straight: if Trump loses, then that will mean his approach was wrong from day one, right, just like Romney? If he fails to even get the nomination, then that means Romney was even smarter and a better candidate than Trump all along?
I think Trump is the only top tier Republican who can lose to Hillary. He has already alienated 55% of the vote.
Last I looked, just about everybody could beat the Hildabeast except Mrs Fiorina who tied.
Romney was smart and a better candidate than the Libertarians and a few soreheads want to admit, but The Donald has an edge.
And remember, nobody likes the Hildabeast, apparently.
PS and FWIW, looks like all the "Conservatives" who bragged about staying home were lying through their teeth.
So it really was the vote fraud. We'll find out someday, just like 1960.
Well he lost the Tard vote, so I'm out.
This reporter reported the facts 14 years ago and now he is lying to change the record. He is part and parcel of the journalist cabal bent on protecting Hillary and Obama. He is part of the effort to white wash Muslim terrorism and the effort to increase Musllim migration regardless of the cost in dead Americans.
Trump is rude and crude. He doesn't play nice. He mocks the physical appearance of his adversaries. Much as he is mocked on a daily basis. He is not going to sit back and take it like the oh so refined Bushes or Romney types. If you don't like it mock him back. But don't stand on the table and hold up your dress like a dainty little flower.
Politics ain't bean bag. Nice guys finish last.
Get back to me when you denounce the left for what the say about Christians and Republicans and conservatives.
And Trig Palin.
Bago, I'm beginning to think the opposite...he's the only one who can win, by shear audacity in calling her out. She has a ton to answer for and he won't pull punches.
Hillary is going to play the victim. Just as she did when she ran for Senator. Trump will not be afraid to call her out. He won't flinch when every pussy in the media is shocked and appalled by what he has to say. Hillary will not know how to deal with it. She won't be able to maintain her facade. Her real bitchy hateful nasty personality will be on full display. The one where she threw ashtrays at Bill and told the Secret Service to not look at her or address her when she walked by. Trump will push her buttons and not give a shit.
Watch and see.
She will play victim and great statesman, but she won't lose her cool. If he makes her 'cry' during a debate, it's all over for him.
It depends on Trump going in hard and getting the public to LISTEN.
She won't cry. She is a mean bitch. She will lose her volcanic temper. Watch and see.
Of course you have to push her. You can't play nice.
Politics ain't bean bag. Nice guys finish last. Trump is the only one who will go after Hillary and puncture her facade so she will display her nasty, bitchy entitled self to the general public. The Hillary that threw glass ashtrays at Bill. The Hillary that laughed at a rape victim. The Hillary that lied to the face of the families of the Benghazi family. Trump will push her buttons.
I remember when Hillary ran for Senate. The media had fainting spells when Rick Lazio walked across the debate stage. Marco Rubio would never call her out. Neither will Ben Carson.
The only thing Hillary has going for her is her vagina. When she pulls the "War on Women" card Trump is the only one who will call her on it. He will not be afraid to ask her about all of the women her husband has raped and abused. He speaks the plain facts that the politically correct hush up. It is that simple
I agree, but she won't lose her cool. She's too close. She will more likely turn on the water works, a la New Hampshire Primary 2008.
You forget that she forgets. She is old and addled these days. She exists in a protected bubble. Much like Obama does. The press never asks her a question. When she went up in front of Congress and got a few sharp questions from Republicans she came up with "What difference does it make."
Plus if you are going to vote for Hillary because she started to cry you were not going to vote for Trump anyway. The Julia's and the Jamal's and the Trayvon's and the pajama boys will never vote for a Republican. So stop chasing them. Get the Bubba's and the Vito's and the working class types who don't vote but are motivated by Trump and telling the truth without political correctness. Hillary will not motivate her base the way Obama did. In fact most of them will just think that there is no way Trump can win. So they will stay home collecting their checks and eating cupcakes.
I dig mocking reporters - that is not how you do it.
I don't see anyone mocking them other than Trump. Other than Cruz and he is too genteel. You have to raise a bruise. Sorry.
Do you realize that the moderator of the next debate had Obama as a guest at her wedding? And she is in control of a Republican Debate. How does that happen?
I bet Trump will call her out on that. If I was one of his advisors I would prep him to do that the first time she asks a snotty question. The media deserves everything Trump can give them no holds barred. This reporter is deliberately lying about what he reported 14 years ago to support the narrative of the Democratic Party. Trying to clear the way for more immigration of refugees and terrorists like the Boston Marathon bombers.
From what I know this guy just has a crooked lower arm/hand. I mean that's sad, but its not like he's blind or lost a leg in Vietnam.
BTW, every day I see people driving up to Handicapped parking spots and they get out and I think "How this is this guy handicapped?, he looks Ok to me".
BTw,BTW, my first boss lost his lower arm in Vietnam (not in combat, in a Helicopter crash stateside). He was complete asshole and no one liked him, except HIS boss. We would've mocked his handicap after work but it was hard to mock.
"The media had fainting spells when Rick Lazio walked across the debate stage."
Ha. I remember than. He "invaded her space" and that made her uncomfortable and afterwards she cried like a little girl and then all her "Sisters" felt bad about it and voted for her or something.
The majority of voters want neither Hillary nor Trump. Both are extreme examples of things people generally don't like. They will hate having that choice. I think that usually the two candidates in the general have a majority of people supporting one or the other, with those hating both being a minority to win over. But this time, it's most people who see both as unacceptable, though for different reasons. It's gonna be interesting to see how that works out. Whose disgust is most principled?
What bag said.
BTW, I will never vote by mail. I thoroughly enjoy going to polls on election day if only to see that everything is up to snuff.
ndspinelli said...
What bag said.
With all due respect, I think bags is wrong on this. Look at the last election. Obama was certainly a worse candidate than Hillary and should have cause a more "unacceptable" reaction among conservatives. Romney caused no where near the apoplexy amongst liberals. I'm kinda with edutcher on what caused Obama's startling upset in 2012: I think it was "just enough fraud."
But Dems are going to need much more voter fraud this time around. How else to explain an utter lack of concern by the DNC for fielding such a wildly unpopular candidate? The last time I looked, more than one Republican nominee was beating Clinton in head-to-head polls. It almost looks like the DNC is thinking "it doesn't really matter who we run this time b/c voter eligibility rules and therefore election rues have changed."
I recently got a postcard in the mail from the registrar practically begging me to vote early and by mail. I didn't need to show any form of ID. Also, how else to explain Hillary's recent extreme pro-immigrant rhetoric? She's banking on something. The fix is in.
Because I'm a slow learner, it took me longer than most to realize that this reporter was the same one who wrote the story about about the NJ 9/11 cheerleaders back in 2001. All I can say is what a chump move to go back and practically deny your own reporting for what looks like partisan reasons. The reporter looks like a partisan hack.
Trooper, okay, I can go along with her losing it because of old and addled, but I don't think it likely. I think chick is on to something with the numbers. She just has to show up and not lose it, and even if she does, the fix may be in, big time.
Post a Comment