“You’re going to have to watch and study the mosques because a lot of talk is going on at the mosques,” Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump says on MSNBC when asked what should be done to protect U.S. citizens.
“From what I heard, in the old days, meaning a while ago, we had great surveillance going on in and around mosques in New York City and I understand our mayor totally cut that out”
Asked about possibility of France shutting mosques with radical ties and whether he’d do same as U.S. president, Trump says, “I would hate to do it, but it’s something that you’re going to have to strongly consider because some of the ideas and some of the hatred, the absolute hatred, is coming from these areas”
Agree or disagree, at least Trump is willing to discuss things that no insider politician would.
11 comments:
If we monitored Jim Jones, that might have saved lives, but the end results happened outside the United States. We monitored David Koresh, but that resulted in probably more deaths.
It would be great to say monitor all places for this level of extremism. But we all know how that would end. The DNC would have the IRS monitoring every church and calling any that opposed abortion to be extremist. We know there are some people that think it is extreme to question AGW/CC, and those who do should be jailed.
I'm not sure this strategy of monitoring will work people like Obama running the show. It didn't work out well when Clinton was running it. Lots of women and children burned to death on Clinton's watch, yet nobody paid much attention to the Mosques prior to 9/11.
The President is on TV surrendering, and describing in detail why we can't destroy these guys. The reporters only have one question over and over: "Why can't we destroy ISIS?" He's basically saying: you don't know what I know, war is too messy, get use to the status quo, it's not my fault, and anyone who disagrees is an asshole.
I think it comes down to that we just need a lot more deaths before it's time.
Snowden says monitoring calls from suspected terrorist is out. And I think the Supremes agree, i could be wrong.
I think this is pretty simple: kill as many ISIS as fast as possible, and keep killing them until they stop killing everyone else.
The problem is the recruiting. We cant kill them as fast as they are replacing them.
We are going to be at this for a long time.
A couple of more massive attacks and only the Schmendriks will have a problem with closing the mosques. The Schmendrik socialists will continue to submit NO MATTER WHAT. You want a world with freedom for the coming generations? You must first defeat the Schmendriks and then Islam. By the way, Schmendrik Obama continues to insist on the importation of "Syrian" jihadis.
Recruiting is stopped by making them a failure rather than a success. The recruiting numbers are all due to them being perceived as the strong horse. Nobody wants to ride a beaten lame jackass, and we can make them into that. Being in ISIS needs to become the most dangerous, disappointing cult on earth, and right away. It's either innocent lives or guilty, but a lot of people are gonna die from here on. All we can affect is which ones. I vote for ISIS to take the hit, and we should make sure to show how that looks to potential recruits - maybe start a Youtube channel.
I doubt that Ritmo feels for the Muslims. He just won't blame our policy until a Republican is running it.
It says something about us that they have to succeed in order for us to take them more seriously.
The next round of polls will have a 10 bounce for The Donald.
And he has been talking about this for a while, so it isn't a new tack with him.
bagoh20 said...
I doubt that Ritmo feels for the Muslims. He just won't blame our policy until a Republican is running it.
No, he'll call us all racists as he represents the True Virtue of Secular Humanism.
I don't see what the upside is for us in accepting more Muslim refugees. I don't think very many of them will become terrorists, but, as we have seen in Paris and Mumbai, it only takes a half dozen or so to spread god awful carnage. Beyond this most of them will be CAIR supporters whose militance will be more directed at anyone here who looks at them cross eyed rather than at a preacher at the mosque who considers murder a religious obligation. And Rotherham is an inspiring story of how people of different backgrounds can get together and enrich each other's lives........I remember reading the Autobiography of Malcolm X. He talked about seeing refugees from the Hungarian rebellion arrive at the airport. He didn't favor their arrival. He said that in two weeks they would learn the n-word and use it on him......I'm pretty sure he would approve of the influx of these refugees though, but I have the same response he had about the Hungarians. In about two weeks time, these refugees will consider me their enemy. It's interesting to note that Malcolm X is considered a realist, and I'm considered a bigot.......Well, anyway what's the upside of importing people who don't like us?
Post a Comment