Thursday, October 30, 2014

Last Kiss


18 comments:

chickelit said...

Beautiful photo. I never cared much for Pearl Jam.

I can elaborate.

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

Pearl Jam = semen.

That is all.

deborah said...

I don't know from Pearl Jam, couldn't name one song of theirs, but I came across this cover, which I think is gorgeous. They guy's voice is so cool.

Eric, thank you. I did not know that. Their name always struck me as weird.

Please elaborate, chick. Unless you're saying you're not into semen :)

ndspinelli said...

Inga-lite gets only pity comments.

deborah said...

Nick, if you're planning on trolling me like you have Inga, please reconsider. I'm not your enemy, but I'm not going to roll over because you don't approve of me.

deborah said...

The last thing I need is you putting my real name on line.

chickelit said...

ndspinelli said...
Inga-lite gets only pity comments.

That's bullshit, spinelli. I do a lot of music posts and most of them get few comments. This doesn't dissuade me in the least because I like each and every music posts I do. I do think it's cool when somebody learns something, even if it's just one person.

chickelit said...

Deborah, I'm biased against the Seattle bands of the 90's because they mostly piggy backed on the grunge bands of the 80's. The latter never got the sort of commercial payback they deserved.

ndspinelli said...

I have no beef w/ you chick. Did I make too much fun of cheeseheads? Deborah crossed the line. I had her back over the past couple years and she started talking out of her stupid, duplicitous ass. She called me a stalker which is a FUCKING LIE! Don't get between her and I. Just stay the fuck out of it. She's now trying to make herself a preemptive victim, so she is now Inga2, not Inga-lite. She can end it by taking back the stalker comment. It will be over then. Easy. It's both the right thing, and smart thing to do.

deborah said...

Nick, my beef with you is you crossing the line and posting someone's real name online. Some woman wanted to lie about her credentials and be a general pain in the ass, but YOU crossed the line.

Anyone that knows what you did to Inga would consider the possibility that you go out of your way to keep tabs on Meade. For you to report that you have accidentally come across him chatting up coeds is crossing the line.

But I TAKE IT BACK. The last person I need as an enemy is ex private investigator cum stalker.

And I would imagine that Meade and Althouse have made it their business to know what you look like. Hey, that's an idea. Imagine the boost Althouse would get to her blog if she could have someone arrested for stalking her.

Now get off my lawn and stay the fuck out of my posts.

deborah said...

Thank you, chick. I know in general what grunge is, I think. As I said I don't know from Pearl Jam, I just came across this excellent cover.

ndspinelli said...

One of the skills a PI has is reading people. I have studied body language but actually reading people on a daily basis is what really honed my skills. Obviously, those skills are useless in this format. There are folks better than myself @ reading people in this format. They had you pegged early on. But, like Inga in her early days, you seemed engaging and benign to me. A VERY astute person nailed Inga early, as well as you. I will comment, when and where I please. You love drama like your soulmate. Hell, it might even get you some extra comments on your lame ass posts. Maybe that's the intent.

deborah said...

I had Inga pegged from just about the gitgo, except I didn't know she was an actual person who could be found. Unlike you, I can read people online, and you might consider the possibility that the person who tagged Inga and me is a sock puppet.

The hoot is I am real and can easily prove it. The 'VERY astute person' who suspected me 'early' was seeing who they wanted to see.

We can put this baby to bed if you post a disposable gmail address in your profile. We can then phone each other from pay phones. As I'm charming as fuck, I think I can allay your concerns.

ndspinelli said...

You are not understanding me. I have no doubt you are a real person, and quite separate from that horrid piece of rotting and pus filled flesh w/ at least 25 sockpuppets of which I'm aware. I have no desire to communicate w/ you anywhere but here, the latter being only because you have lied about me. So, any communication from me will be w/ that lie in the forefront of my mind, and my comments will always reflect that.

deborah said...

I did not lie about you, I asked you a question, which yes, cast an aspersion upon your character. For that I apologize.

ndspinelli said...

Deborah, Here's why I was pissed. In a world where lying, cheating, fudging, etc. is rampant, it is how I made my living. Proving people to be liars. I have testified under oath many times. I have had situations where I could have lied and nobody[on earth anyway] would have known. Telling the truth made me look bad. But, I told the truth. When we went through the Clinton lying under oath my blood boiled. Now, I am painfully aware that people lie under oath all the time. I worked for a prosecutors office and I know cops lied to help get convictions. It made my fucking skin crawl. You can search long and hard to find someone who has the character I do. But, what pissed me off as much as you casting aspersions on my character was, as I said, it was stupid. I keep my mouth shut better than most anyone. I would never stalk anyone. I do surveillance for a living but NEVER for hobby. But, no matter; surveillance is predicated on the person not knowing they're being watched. So, announcing it would be stupid. I can be an asshole, prick, wise ass, but I am not stupid.

Thank you for taking back the questions of my character. You see me dish it out here, and take it as well. But, my attacks on my character is not something I will never abide. We shall move forward, w/ this behind us.

deborah said...

Fair enough. Thank you for accepting my take back.

I understand if you want to drop it, but what was it that Inga said that made you feel that locating her was a legitimate use of your skills? I keep coming back to that because it comes across as dirty pool, unless there's something egregious she did/said I'm not aware of.

She said she invited you and the missus to her daughter's wedding. Is that true?

ndspinelli said...

You don't have all the facts. Let's just leave it @ that.