Saturday, September 28, 2013

"to ensure they were "not shady characters""

"A National Security Agency employee was able to secretly intercept the phone calls of nine foreign women for six years without ever being detected by his managers, the agency's internal watchdog has revealed."
The unauthorised abuse of the NSA's surveillance tools only came to light after one of the women, who happened to be a US government employee, told a colleague that she suspected the man – with whom she was having a sexual relationship – was listening to her calls.
The case is among 12 documented in a letter from the NSA's inspector general to a leading member of Congress, who asked for a breakdown of cases in which the agency's powerful surveillance apparatus was deliberately abused by staff.
The letter, from Dr George Ellard, only lists cases that were investigated and later "substantiated" by his office. But it raises the possibility that there are many more cases that go undetected. 
The Atlantic lists those twelve incidents.
1. In 2011, an employee facing a polygraph test confessed to performing a SIGNIT query "out of curiosity" on the home phone number of his girlfriend, who was a foreign national. He was able to view metadata from the query. The employee wasn't disciplined, and retired in 2012.

2. Another employee confession before a polygraph test: this time, in 2005, the employee admitted that he had a SIGNIT collection run for a month in 2003 on his girlfriend's number in order to figure out whether she was up to anything that "might get [him] in trouble." His violation was referred upwards, but he also retired before disciplinary action was taken.

3. In 2004, and employee collected voice recording of her husband on a foreign telephone number that was unfamiliar to her in her husband's phone, because she suspected he was being unfaithful. She resigned before she was disciplined — though the letter notes that the recommended disciplinary action was to fire her.

4. Between the years 1998 and 2003, one employee of the agency listened to the calls of nine female foreign nationals. That collection resulted in the collection of voice data on two U.S. citizens. It was discovered when a foreign national employed by the U.S. and "having sexual relations" with the employee in question suspected something was up, and told another employee of the agency that she thought the employee in question was listening to her phone calls. He resigned before he was disciplined, while suspended without pay.

5. Another employee targeting female foreign nationals. This time, it was between the years 2001 and 2003, and the employee resigned before being disciplined.

6. An employee, under a polygraph test, admitted to accessing communications of two foreign nationals without authorization in an investigation completed in 2006. He was suspended without pay for 10 days, and prohibited from getting promotions or other awards and pay increases, for a year.

7. In 2011, a female employee assigned and then reviewed data collection on her boyfriend's telephone number. She also routinely ran foreign numbers she collected from social situations through the system to make sure her new acquaintances weren't "shady." She resigned before being disciplined.

8. On his first day with access to SIGNIT in 2005, a military employee ran six email addresses of his former girlfriend through the system, just to "practice" using it. In the investigation, he testified that he hadn't read the content of those queries. He received a demotion in rank, and in pay, and was denied a security clearance because of the incident.

9. In addition to querying his own name, this employee repeatedly ran his girlfriend's number through the system in 2006, along with her name. He also queried another number without authorization two times. It was recommended that he be fired, but he resigned before that happened.

10. In 2008, an employee looked up information on two relatives of a "valid intelligence target," who where in the U.S. The employee received a written reprimand.

11. A military member of a tactical intelligence unit used the SIGNIT system to query the communications of his wife in 2009. She, also in the military, was stationed abroad. The abuse was discovered in an audit. Eventually, the matter was referred to the DOJ in 2009, after the person in question suffered a rank reduction, pay reduction, and revocation of access to classified information.

12.  A military member repeatedly queried foreign telephone numbers, apparently in order to learn foreign languages. The abuse was discovered in an audit and he was barred from accessing classified information.

11 comments:

Icepick said...

And just for the fuck of it, "First, bitchez!"

And the NSA knew that microseconds before it published publicly.

Icepick said...

For all the good it will do the bastages.

ndspinelli said...

I'm shocked.

sakredkow said...

People violate regulations in bureaucracies all the time for personal gain. So you try to build in safeguards to make it almost impossible to do that, but the tighter the safeguards the closer and closer your agency gets to a mini-police state, or on the macro level and actual police state. Slapping the bitches down hard as an act of deterrence is good but even that's obviously not going to stop the black hats from exploiting vulnerabilities.

What are you going to do? Welcome to the 21st c.

bagoh20 said...

So they were looking for shady characters with advanced technology and all they needed was a mirror.

bagoh20 said...

"What are you going to do? "

First off, resist people like you who want to install millions more of these bureaucratic weasels to run every area of our lives. If you don't create the bureaucracies, you won't need to have people with these powers. Instead, you suggest creating more bureaucracies to watch over the ones that are already out of control. Maybe there is something wrong with your central premise.

More is not better, and small is beautiful.

sakredkow said...

If you don't create the bureaucracies, you won't need to have people with these powers.

So your solution is we don't need the NSA. Sorry, your simplistic notions are not palatable to me either.

bagoh20 said...

The NSA is not one bureaucracy nor is eliminating it the only other option, but this is probably way beyond your powers of imagination that can only see adding to government, even when the size and complexity of it is precisely the problem. Maybe we can have another NSA to watch the NSA.

sakredkow said...

"If only they would listen to me!"

sakredkow said...

esist people like you who want to install millions more

Big or small government isn't at all my issue. That's your issue.

After all this time arguing with me, you don't get that.

edutcher said...

So it's not just the crooked government; it's the crooked employees acting on their own, too.